Use of the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale for poor outcome prediction among emergency department patients with suspected infection

Objective@#The Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS) is a triage tool for patients in the emergency department (ED). This study aimed to evaluate the ability of the KTAS to predict poor outcomes in South Korean ED patients with a suspected infection. We also compared the effectiveness of KTAS with that of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) in predicting poor outcomes. @*Methods@#We conducted a single-center retrospective study that included adult patients with a suspected infection who were admitted to the ED between January 2019 and December 2019. Patients who received a prescription for antibiotics and associated culture tests in the ED were considered to have an infection. Poor outcomes were evaluated by in-hospital mortality, general ward admission, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate and compare KTAS, NEWS, and MEWS. @*Results@#Of the 4,127 patients in the study, in-hospital mortality was reported in 154 (3.7%) patients. The median KTAS was lower in the non-survivors than in the survivors (2.51 vs. 3.35). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the KTAS was associated with in-hospital mortality, ward admission, and ICU admission. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) values for predicting in-hospital mortality associated with the KTAS, NEWS, and MEWS were 0.776 (95% confidence interval, 0.747-0.803), 0.829 (0.759-0.811) and 0.739 (0.694-0.786), respectively. @*Conclusion@#Our results showed that the KTAS was associated with in-hospital mortality, ward admissions, and ICU admissions among ED patients with a suspected infection. Thus, KTAS may be reliable in predicting a poor outcome in ED patients with a suspected infection.

Validation of systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria without white blood cell count in Korean Triage and Acuity Scale

OBJECTIVE: The systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria used in the triage scale have been implemented incompletely without laboratory data, such as the white blood cell (WBC) count, so the validity of SIRS as a triage tool has been uncertain. This study assessed the validity of the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS) in applying SIRS with or without a WBC count. METHODS: The KTAS level was simulated by the number of SIRS criteria. This new KTAS level that did not apply the WBC count was defined as the partial-simulated KTAS (PS-KTAS), and the KTAS level including the WBC count was called the total-simulated KTAS (TS-KTAS). The authors used the intensive care unit (ICU), overall admission rate, and use of emergent interventions as the primary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1,077 patients with a suspected infection were triaged using the SIRS in KTAS. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the odds ratio for overall admission was greater with a higher KTAS level than with KTAS level 4 in both the PS-KTAS and TS-KTAS. All areas under the curve of the PS- and TS-KTAS for ICU admission and emergent intervention rate both showed very low discriminant powers. CONCLUSION: Compared to TS-KTAS, PS-KTAS showed a similar or partially better relationship between the KTAS level and the use of critical medical resource. Future research is recommended to improve the matching between the SIRS scoring and each KTAS level to better classify the patient severity status and develop or discover new infection assessment tools that can be applied to KTAS.

Experience of Decision Making about Selective Fetal Reduction among Women Who Conceived through Assisted Reproductive Techniques / 임상간호연구

PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore and understand the experience of decision making among women undergoing or forgoing selective fetal reduction who have higher-order multiple pregnancies through assisted reproductive techniques. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted from August 1, to October 30, 2013. Eight participants were interviewed and the interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Six persons participated in in-depth interviews in person and two participated over the telephone. A thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Four themes were identified and carefully named: Confusion after higher-order multiple pregnancy; Obstacles to choice: Uncertain safety; Weighing between reality and ideality and; Influences of medical professionals. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated a wide range of factors considered by women when making decisions about selective fetal reduction, and mothers'feelings of conflict and distress in the decision-making process. The results suggest that it is important for nurses to provide emotional support and consolation, in addition to sufficient information. These findings will help nurses improve their counseling techniques by understanding the situation of infertile couples.

Validity of iPad for Remote Diagnosis of Rib Fracture

PURPOSE: In elderly and patients with underlying diseases, mortality rate is increased when compared to rib fractures which occurred in other patients. Because there is a shortage of emergency physicians or real-time consultation with radiologists in many countries, it is necessary to receive a formal image reading remotely from an expert. We suggested the use of iPad in X-ray reading and compared the diagnostic validity of iPad, which was highly portable, with that of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor. METHODS: Fifty four X-ray cases of rib fracture and 54 cases without rib fracture were randomized and reviewed by 10 emergency physicians. A total of 108 cases were divided 1st to 54th and 55th to 108th. Two sessions were separated with a four-week interval. If the reviewer interpreted the 1st to 54th with iPad, they did 55th to 108th with LCD monitor. Reviewers reported the presence of rib fracture, the number of fractured ribs, and diagnostic confidence of 5-scale. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement among reviewers in LCD and iPad was 0.551, 0.524 in Fleiss-kappa value. The intraobserver agreement between tools for each reviewer was 0.410-0.859 (Mean=0.628+/-0.150). Reviewers showed sensitivity over 0.810 regardless of the tool; 0.810- 0.966 (Mean=0.879+/- 0.054) in LCD, 0.828-1.000 (Mean=0.898+/-0.052) in iPad. The specificity was 0.520- 0.860 (Mean=0.750+/-0.117) in LCD and 0.560-0.880 (Mean=0.708+/-0.111) in iPad. Therefore, remote consultation of X-ray by iPad with a specialist was possible with minimized temporal and spatial limits in the emergency room. CONCLUSION: In our study, there was no statistical difference in the diagnosis of rib fracture by X-ray via iPad or LCD. Therefore, remote consultation of X-ray by iPad with a specialist in the emergency room was possible, with temporal and spatial limits by iPad.